Social Responsibility Customer Orientation †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Social Responsibility Customer Orientation. Answer: Introduction: Masoud has read many articles and studies to understand the basic concept of corporate social responsibility. He has integrated the two models of Caroll and Vissser in order to develop a new international model of corporate social responsibility. That model is known as The Pyramid Model of CSR. The model involves various aspects of CSR concept such as legal, global, ethical, economic etc. Aguinis and Glavas on the other hand reviewed many articles and journals and developed a framework of CSR that involves institutional, organizational and individual level of analysis for CSR. This framework is majorly about the proactive and reactive CSR actions and the related outcomes. Contingency is another aspect that has also been considered by the author in order to see the effect of the situations of the outcomes. Tai and Chuang focuses on different aspect of the CSR concept. It focuses on reviewing the active and passive ways of CSR that helps the companies at multinational level to earn hig h revenues for long term. The research in this study is related to the CSR activities and the revenue earned by the companies at international level. Korschun, Bhattacharya and Swain have studied customers social responsibility management and its relation with the job performance of the employees and customer orientation. This study focuses on CSR role in order to motivate the employees the author has argues that CSR can be used as the motivator for motivating the employees of the frontline operations. Common themes across all the four articles: As discussed that Masoud has studied the framework of corporate social responsibility that is at the international level but the study focuses on the impact of CSR at international level that is about the action the CSR. Likewise, Aguinis and Glavas also discusses about the proactive and reactive actions of CSR at different levels. Tai and Chuangs argues that there is the impact of CSR action on the revenue of the company. This also focuses on the fact of CSR on the companys outcomes in terms of revenue just like the above two articles. The last journal article or the study of Korschun, Bhattacharya and Swain also argues for the actions of CSR that helps the company to motivate the employees who works at frontline operations. It has been analysed that the actions of the CSR and the relative outcomes is the basis of all the studies that has been disused in the report. The similarities of all the studies have already been discussed above. As far as the differences are considered, it has been analysed that these articles have similar basis but different aspects that are being studied related to CSR.as far as the study of Masoud is considered, it has been analysed that the framework that has been formed by the author for CSR is at the international level and the integration of two models is done to frame the same. The next article of Aguinis and Glavas also deals with model but it has considered the aspect of three levels that are organizational, institutional and individual. The article discusses about the actions of CSR with proactive or reactive nature. Outcomes of the actions have also been analysed. In the study of Tai and Chuangs, the discussion is about the actions of CSR but the major element that has been considered is the revenue of the companies and the effect of CSR on them. The aspect of international factors is also argued by Masoud but the focus of his study was the factors such as global, economic, legal etc. and their impact on CSR on the other hand, in the article of Tai and Chuang, the international factor is revenue of the company. The study of Korschun, Bhattacharya and Swain is very different as it focuses on the CSR as the motivation factor. Limitations of the study and the difference in the research design: In the study of Masoud, it has been analysed that an international framework that has been formed with regard to CSR study involves integration of the various factors such as social, ethical, legal etc. all these factors can be different at different places. Thus, integrating such factors and treating them as similar for all the countries is the major limitation of this study. Aguinis and Glavas study involves the factors at different levels management. The major limitation of this study is that only the qualitative aspect is considered which may lead to biased outcomes. Tai and Chuangs study considered the impact of CSR on revenue. But, it has been identified that CSR does not directly affect the revenue of the company and this study has not involve the associated factors. It is difficult to find out the limitation in the study of Korschun, Bhattacharya and Swain because it has considered CSR as motivation factor but only considering the quantitative aspect is not acceptable for an appropriate study. It has been analysed that motivation is the factor that needs to be mentioned qualitatively as well. Masoud has developed the new international model of CSR that is recommended to be applied on different societal issues in future so that its effects can be seen and analysed on the same. On the other hand, as far as the study of Aguinis and Glavas is considered, it has been analysed that this study cam be used in future to gain the knowledge about multilevel and individual level approaches as most of the articles that has been reviews in this study are related to organisational and institutional level. Tai and Chuangs study can helps in identifying the CSR activities as the strategies to enhance the revenue of the company. The companies can implement the strategies of CSR to earn high revenue after realizing its effect on the same. The study of Korschun, Bhattacharya and Swain can be used to implement the motivational strategy in the organizations so as to motivate the employees as discussed in the study that CSR activities have their impact on the motivation level of the employees a nd especially the frontline employees. References: Aguinis, H. and Glavas, A., 2012. What we know and dont know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda.Journal of management,38(4), pp.932-968. Korschun, D., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Swain, S.D., 2014. Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees.Journal of Marketing,78(3), pp.20-37. Masoud, N., 2017. How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: the International Pyramid Model of CSR.International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility,2(1), p.4. Tai, F.M. and Chuang, S.H., 2014. Corporate social responsibility.Ibusiness,6(03), p.117.